Quantitative Evaluation Research and Its Implications for the Development of Islamic Education.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69900/ag.v6i1.514Keywords:
Riset Evaluasi, Kuantitatif , Kebijakan PendidikanAbstract
This study aims to describe quantitative evaluation research and its implications for the development of Islamic education in Indonesia. The research was conducted through library research by reviewing literature that discusses educational evaluation models and theories such as CIPP, Goal-Oriented, Goal-Free, and Kirkpatrick, as well as relevant policy documents from educational institutions and the Ministry of Religious Affairs. The analytical approach used is descriptive-analytical, including the identification of key concepts, classification of evaluation approaches, and synthesis of implications for educational practice and policy. The findings indicate that quantitative evaluation research plays a strategic role in systematically and measurably assessing the effectiveness of educational programs and policy interventions. It provides empirical evidence to strengthen institutional accountability, support evidence-based decision-making, and encourage continuous improvement in educational management. In practice, the application of appropriate evaluation models enables Islamic educational institutions to measure the impact of programs such as Madrasah Digital Transformation, Religious Moderation, and Religious Literacy Assessment, thereby strengthening monitoring and follow-up mechanisms.
References
Alamsyah, M. “Analisis Efektivitas Asesmen Kuantitatif dalam Meningkatkan Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Journal of Education Research and Policy 4, no. 2 (2023): 45–47.
Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. The Concept of Education in Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1991.
Alanshori, M. Zainuddin, et al. “The Application of the CIPP Evaluation Model in Educational Programs in Indonesia.” Journal of Educational Evaluation (2024): 6–7.
Aprianti, N. “Evaluation Using the CIPP Model in Islamic Religious Education.” Conciencia 13, no. 1 (2024): 55–57.
Ary, Donald, et al. Introduction to Research in Education. 8th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2010.
Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kemenag RI. Pedoman Asesmen Nasional Literasi Dasar Keagamaan (ANLDB). Jakarta: Puslitbang Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, 2024.
Bahiyah, Khoridatul, et al. “Learning Evaluation in Islam: Review of the Concept of the Qur’an and Hadith.” Modern Islamic Studies & Civilization 5, no. 1 (2024): 88–92.
Creswell, John W. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2023.
. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2018.
Detik News. “Kemenag Gelar Asesmen Nasional Literasi Keagamaan 2025 bagi Guru dan Siswa SD.” Diakses 16 Oktober 2025. https://www.detik.com/hikmah/khazanah/d-8191892/kemenag-gelar-asesmen-nasional-literasi-keagamaan-2025-bagi-guru-dan-siswa-sd.
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam. Transformasi Digital Madrasah 2024: Arah Kebijakan dan Implementasi. Kementerian Agama RI. Diakses 11 Oktober 2025. https://madrasah.kemenag.go.id/berita/transformasi-digital-madrasah.
Guba, Egon G., dan Daniel L. Stufflebeam. Evaluation in Education: The Need and the Response. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa, 1970.
Guskey, Thomas. “Data-Driven Decision Making and the Future of Educational Evaluation.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 42, no. 1 (2023): 12–19.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. “Moderasi Beragama: Kunci Indonesia Emas 2045 – Penjelasan Direktur Diktis.” Diakses 10 Oktober 2025. https://pendis.kemenag.go.id/direktorat-perguruan-tinggi-keagamaan-islam/moderasi-beragama-kunci-indonesia-emas-2045-ini-penjelasan-direktur-diktis.
Kementerian Agama RI. Moderasi Beragama: Buku Saku Penguatan Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Kemenag RI, 2022.
. Roadmap Transformasi Digital Madrasah 2023–2029. Jakarta: Direktorat KSKK Madrasah, 2023.
Kirkpatrick, Donald L., dan James D. Kirkpatrick. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2006.
Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, dan Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2020.
Moore, Gary W. Developing and Evaluating Educational Research. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1983.
Muhammad Ali. Memahami Riset Perilaku dan Sosial. Bandung: Pustaka Cendekia Utama, 2011.
Mukhlis, M. “The Effectiveness of the Lok-R Model in Enhancing Academic Achievement in the Islamic Religious Education Study Program.” AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam. 2025.
Mukhlis, Mukhlis, Ahyar Rasyidi, and Husna Husna.. “Tujuan Pendidikan Islam: Dunia, Akhirat Dan Pembentukan Karakter Muslim Dalam Membentuk Individu Yang Berakhlak Dan Berkontribusi Positif.” AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam 1–20. doi: 10.69900/ag.v4i1.189. 2024
Rossi, Peter H., Howard E. Freeman, and Mark W. Lipsey. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2004.
Scriven, Michael. Evaluation Thesaurus. 4th ed. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, 1991.
Stufflebeam, Daniel L., dan Anthony J. Coryn. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2014.
Tashakkori, Abbas, dan Charles Teddlie. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 1998.
Tsani, I. “Affective Evaluation Model for Islamic Religious Education.” Didaktika 12, no. 2 (2023): 112–114.
Tyler, Ralph W. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.
Zuhdi, Muhammad. “Evaluasi Kebijakan Pendidikan Islam: Tantangan dan Prospek.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 13, no. 2 (2023): 221–240.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fahriah, Nuril Huda, Dina Hermina, Hamrani Hamrani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
