From Sanad to Algorithms: The Transformation of Islamic Authority and the Reconstruction of Nusantara Islamic Epistemology in the Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69900/ag.v6i2.577Keywords:
religious authority, sanad, algorithmAbstract
This article analyzes the transformation of Islamic religious authority in the digital era by examining the shift from a sanad-based epistemological structure to legitimacy mediated by digital platform algorithms. In classical Islamic scholarship, sanad functions as a mechanism of transmission, verification, and legitimation that ensures the continuity of religious knowledge and scholarly authority. However, the rise of digital media has reshaped the production and circulation of religious knowledge, where visibility, user engagement, and algorithmic recommendation systems increasingly determine who gains influence within the contemporary religious public sphere. This study aims to explain how these transformations affect the construction of religious authority and how Islamic epistemological traditions negotiate with emerging digital technological structures, this research employs a qualitative approach using a literature-based method that engages recent scholarship on religious authority, digital religion studies, and theories of the mediatization of religion. The analysis is conducted through a conceptual-critical framework that integrates Islamic epistemology with contemporary media theory. The findings suggest that the ongoing transformation should not be understood as a complete replacement of sanad-based authority by algorithmic systems. Rather, it reflects a process of hybridization between normative-transmissive legitimacy and performative-distributive legitimacy. The article proposes the concept of algorithmic authority as an analytical framework to understand how contemporary religious legitimacy is increasingly shaped through the interaction between traditional chains of scholarly transmission and the infrastructural logic of digital platforms. The main contribution of this study lies in developing a conceptual bridge between classical Islamic epistemology and the dynamics of authority in the digital public sphere, offering a new perspective for the study of digital Islam in contemporary Muslim societies.
References
Abidin, Crystal.Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2018.
Ahmad, Rumadi.Islam Nusantara: The Long Road to Religious Moderation. Jakarta: Kompas, 2015.
Baso, Ahmad.Islam Nusantara: The Genius Ijtihad and Ijma of Indonesian Ulama. Jakarta: Pustaka Afid, 2015.
Brown, Jonathan A. C. Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. 2nd ed. London: Oneworld Publications, 2020.
Bucher, Taina. “Algorithmic Imaginaries and the Politics of Invisibility.” Information, Communication & Society 23, no. 4 (2020): 531–46.
———. If…Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Bunt, Gary R. Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2018.
Burhani, Ahmad Najib. “Digital Islam and Religious Authority in Indonesia.”Contemporary Islam 15, no. 3 (2021): 345–362.
Campbell, Heidi A. Digital Creatives and the Rethinking of Religious Authority. London: Routledge, 2021.
———. “Introduction: The Rise of the Study of Digital Religion.” Dalam Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds, edited by Heidi A. Campbell, 1–21. New York: Routledge, 2013.
———., dan Giulia Evolvi. “Contextualizing Current Digital Religion Research on Emerging Technologies.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, no. 1 (2020): 5–17.
———., dan Gregory P. Grieve, ed. Religion in the Digital Age. London: Routledge, 2014.
———., and Stephen Garner.Networked Theology: Negotiating Faith in Digital Culture. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2021.
———., ed. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. London: Routledge, 2013.
Couldry, Nick, dan Ulises A. Mejias. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019.
Dhofier, Zamakhsyari.Pesantren Tradition: A Study of the Kyai's View of Life. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1982.
Eickelman, Dale F., and Jon W. Anderson.New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003.
Evolvi, Giulia. “Religion and the Internet: Digital Religion, (Hyper)Mediated Spaces, and Materiality.” Journal for Religion, Society and Politics 5 (2021): 45–62.
Gillespie, Tarleton. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.
Hjarvard, Stig. “The Mediatization of Religion: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Religious Change.” Northern Lights 6 (2008): 9–26.
———. The Mediatization of Religion: Theorising Religion, Media and Social Change. London: Routledge, 2013.
Hosen, Nadirsyah. “Online Fatwa in Indonesia: From Fatwa Shopping to Googling a Kiai.” InExpressing Islam: Religious Life and Politics in Indonesia, edited by Greg Fealy and Sally White, 159–73. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, 2008.
Lim, Merlyna. “Freedom to Hate: Social Media, Algorithmic Enclaves, and the Rise of Tribal Nationalism in Indonesia.” Critical Asian Studies 49, no. 3 (2017): 411–27.
Lundby, Knut. “Mediatization of Religion.” In Handbook of Religion and Media, 2nd ed., edited by Knut Lundby, 15–28. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.
Salvatore, Armando. “The Public Sphere and Muslim Authority in the Digital Age.” Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture 9, no. 2 (2020): 135–156.
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
Zuboff, Shoshana.The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Ihsan Syarifuddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






